Tag Archives: Gospel

What It Means To Be a Christian: A Response to Jessica Misener

What then is the Christian life? What does it mean to be a Christian? How do you live as a Christian? Well, it doesn’t mean to be a Baptist. It doesn’t mean to be a Lutheran or Catholic or Methodist or Presbyterian. Those labels do not make anybody a Christian. Being a Christian means getting up in the morning and saying in your heart: Jesus, you are my Savior, my King, my Friend, my Treasure, my Hope, my Joy, my Guide, my Protection, my Wisdom, my Advocate, my Strength. I need you, I love you, I trust you to be all that for me today. I know you have given me muscles and a mind and a will. I know you intend for me to use them all in doing things that are just and loving and God-honoring. But you have shown me that without you my will is rebellious, my mind is darkened and my muscles obey the rebel will and the darkened mind.

And so, Lord Jesus, I need you every day. Work for me today – not because I deserve it, but because you paid my ransom. Serve me today – to subdue my will, so that I love what you love and find joy in doing your will; to bring light to my mind, so that I think the truth and see you for who you are, infinitely valuable and beautiful. And so may my body magnify you whether in life or death. That’s what it means to be a Christian. – John Piper

Three days ago I read an article called, “Why I Miss Being a Born-Again Christian.” It was written by Jessica Misener, senior editor for Buzzfeed.com.

My first thought was that she wrote it to belittle Christians and make Christianity sound like it was invented by men. But, what stood out was this: her honesty. Her experiences were very similar to my own. If you’d like to hear some of my story, read the introduction.

In order to give an answer for the hope that I have (1 Peter 3:15), I needed to hear her out. I needed to listen carefully to her, so that I wouldn’t answer questions that were irrelevant to this issue. Instead of putting blame on her, I looked to see what she thought was Christianity.

Before we continue: you might be thinking I want to criticize Jessica and make myself sound good. I wrote this because although some people are condemning her and others are praying for her, I have yet to see someone respond back with the real gospel. That is why I wrote this: I want Jessica to know that she missed out on real Christianity.

Jessica thought she was a Christian, as many people do. The sinners prayer for her was a one-and-done approach to conversion. Instead of someone explaining to her what is conversion or repentance, it became about saying the right things to receive God’s grace. This is tied to a movement today known as the “seeker-sensitive” movement.

The millennial generation is facing the rise of the “seeker-sensitive” movement. I confess that this movement hasn’t gone well for the church as it’s developed. A recent survey conducted at a mega-church in my area discovered that although their congregation was large and filled with young people, the average member only attended every six weeks! One consequence of a “seeker-sensitive” service (making everything comfortable for the “seekers” or inquirers of Christianity) is that it eventually makes the church sound like a nice restaurant: if it doesn’t satisfy your palate, you go somewhere else. Read this article by Carl Trueman that sheds some light on the issue.

It seems like Jessica’s environment taught her a poor version of “Christianity”- this led to her thinking that she was a Christian by simply praying a prayer or doing good deeds (good according to whom?). She admits that the kind of Christianity she heard, was one version among many others. Instead of pointing her to a deep knowledge of Scripture, the church gave her an environment where she could fill the void she had in her life instead of transforming it by clearly communicating the dynamics of the gospel.

To be clear: There’s only one kind of Christianity- the kind the Bible teaches. Sound cliche? I hope so! All arguments eventually form a circle. Eventually, I’ll have to explain where I got all of this from. If you heard a different gospel than the Bible’s, then what you heard was not Christianity. But, first you need to assume that the Bible communicates its message with clarity. We will investigate this later.

It’s important to note that Jesus’ key mission was not to be the only way to heaven. He came to be the only way to God (I.e. John 14:6). When Jesus does talk about heaven, He never does so without also talking about God the Father being there (see John 14, 17; Matthew 26; John 19). As Paul Washer says, “Everyone wants to go to heaven, they just don’t want God to be there when they get there.”

Let’s begin.

Six things I’d like to point about her article

1) Jessica doesn’t know what it means to be “born again.” Even if she thinks it’s all fake and just positive thinking, she needs to know what it should mean to a Christian. What matters is if the belief is correct (otherwise, it’s futile, I.e. 1 Cor. 15).

She writes:

“Whatever “it” [this desire] was, it was powerful enough to bring a girl who grew up in a non-churchgoing family to a sweaty school gym for youth group every week, and binding enough to yoke me to a conservative faith for most of my formative years. From ages 17 until about age 23, I was a born-again Christian, something I’m usually embarrassed to admit here in New York City.”

Born-again in this case sounds like a certain sect of Christianity. It’s a genre of spirituality- you can be a Christian, or you can be a born again Christian.

I remember channel-surfing and coming across the show, “Millionaire Matchmaker.” One of the questions the matchmaker asked her client was, “are you a Christian?” The person said, “yes.” She then asked something like, “So, are you a born again Christian?” The conversation eventually led to her saying that born-again Christians usually don’t believe in sex before marriage. This is true (depends who you’re asking, as premarital sex seems to be becoming more “acceptable”), but definitely not what born-again means.

Here’s the thing: Born-again isn’t a type of Christianity, it refers to conversion. There’s only one way to be born again, and that is through hearing the gospel and believing it.

Consider the teaching of Jesus in John chapter three:

Now there was a man of the Pharisees named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews. This man came to Jesus by night and said to him, “Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher come from God, for no one can do these signs that you do unless God is with him.” Jesus answered him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.” Nicodemus said to him, “How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born?” (John 3:1-4 ESV)

Put yourself in Nicodemus’ sandals:

He was a Pharisee, which means he knew the Old Testament pretty well. He was talking amongst his fellow Pharisee-homeboys [context implies there were only a few who shared his viewpoint], and concluded that yes, Jesus was a teacher sent from God. He saw the evidence. He knew the prophecies. He put all of the evidence together intellectually. He knew from an objective standpoint who Jesus was, but Jesus didn’t tell Nicodemus to pray a sinners prayer. What did He tell him?

“Unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”

Imagine hearing this statement for the first time. The word “born” would bring to mind conception and child birth, “again” would raise your spidey-senses or a hint of, “he’s crazy.” Jesus is talking about something radical- a rebirth, so to speak. But He never told Nicodemus he needed to rebirth himself. He wasn’t responsible for his first birth, neither can he activate a second one.

Nicodemus clearly knew Jesus was talking about something life-changing, but missed the point. He took Jesus statement in an entirely different way. He thought that Jesus was talking about another physical birth, when in fact, Jesus was talking about an internal, spiritual one. According to Ezekiel 36:26, Jesus was talking about a spiritual heart transplant that came with the new covenant. A transplant that would result in a new life, where you desire new things, think differently about old ones, and live differently than the rest of your peers. This is a result of God at work in a sinners heart. That, my friends, is what it means to be born again. It means you’ll never be the same.

How do we deal with this practically? Here’s where context comes into play. The first few verses are talking about God’s work in salvation. The next few verses call for our response:

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. (John 3:16 ESV)

2) She doesn’t know which Christianity is the real one, and consequently the gospel.

To use the jargon of my former life, I became a “believer” in Christ shortly after my mom “got saved” — the term evangelicals use to mean a conversion to a very specific kind of Christianity, the Billy Graham and gay Teletubbies kind that preaches Jesus as the only path to salvation.

In her mind, there are many types of Christianity, ones that do not claim Jesus as the only way to heaven or homosexuality as a sin. If you want my take on whether homosexuality is wrong, check out my series Homosexuals Do Not Exist.

It is true that there are many denominations and forms of Christianity (Eastern Orthodox, Unitarian, Universalist, Messianic Jew, Presbyterian, Baptist, Lutheran, Methodist, RCA), but not all of them are alike. There is only one true, historic Christianity, before denominations and church politics come into play.

Some will say that the Bible is open to interpretation and we should just pursue loving God and our neighbor like Jesus taught us. Funny, how can you be so sure of that, since it’s in the Bible after all? At this point, it would make sense to claim that Christianity is a movement invented by men for men, since there are so many opinions across the board. However, we must remember that early Christians claimed the same source (the Bible) and Jesus claimed it was written about Him (John 5). In order to discredit Christianity, you have to diminish or overthrow the Bible, that’s where all of these denominations splintered from. Jessica points to her Religious Studies at Yale as the nail in the coffin of her faith.

During my master’s degree program, my plan of going on to do a Ph.D. gradually dissolved — Exhibit A: me working full time at BuzzFeed, hi! — but something else materialized: a swelling doubt about the faith I’d set out to preserve, which hinged almost solely on believing the Bible to be the literal, inspired word of God. As I learned ancient Greek and Hebrew and pored over the biblical text in its original languages, and read it in larger quantities than I’d ever read it at church, its discrepancies began to shine a hot and uncomfortable spotlight on my personal religious views. Pieces of the gospels contradicted each other, I realized. Greek words, like the ones we’ve translated 2,000 years later to mean “homosexuality,” didn’t quite mean what modern evangelicals wanted them to mean. Early Christians disagreed up to the fifth century on which portions of texts should even be in the biblical canon.

More and more, I realized that the Bible was a flawed, messy, deeply human book — and that in treating it as an unimpeachable guidebook for life in the 21st century, many conservative Christians were basing their entire worldviews on a text that, in my opinion, wasn’t that much different from any other historical collection of letters and stories. I was forced to confront the fact that I’d converted into a pre-fab worldview: one hatched largely in recent American history from Jonathan Edwards and the theology of the Great Awakening, and one that “family values” politics has buoyed through modern decades.

This is why we need to go back to the sources and examine the evidence. If Jessica is right, then Christians should jump ship because their faith is useless. This is also why her saying that the early church didn’t know which books belonged in the Bible is such a crucial argument. I will explain this at a later time by examining the Council of Nicea.

The way she understood salvation was very pragmatic; it was all about what she could do. She thought that since she was a Christian, she should vote Republican, tell non-Christians to consider why they’re drinking, and “proselytize” by getting involved in different school activities. None of these are wrong, they’re just not always correctly executed. What is absent from her article, is any understanding of why Jesus died for her sins or any part of what Christianity is about. In fact, she bought into the lie of the God-shaped hole in her life.

Some days I wake up in my bedroom in Brooklyn and I just don’t know what to do, in an existential sense. Christianity gave me something to do. A large reason I converted to the faith as a teen was because I felt a weird void in my life, like something was missing that no relationship, amount of money, or enviable career could fill. The Christian message was packaged and sold to me as the only thing that could fill that void. And for six years, I let it.

In other words, “Christianity” filled a void but never satisfied it. She is not the only one to fall into the dangers of a God-shaped hole theology. The idea that every person has a God-shaped hole in their hearts and are aware of it is silly. There might be an awareness that you aren’t doing what you’re supposed to do, but ask almost any person and they’ll tell you they feel the same thing. God is not here to fulfill our desires, we are here to fulfill His, which is satisfying (Psalm 16).

What the Bible teaches, is that your heart is not right (sinful); it’s filled with error, not just empty of God. It worships creation and goes against what you were created to do (Rom. 1:20-31). Your conscience is also broken because of sin (Jer. 17, Rom. 1). You don’t need a filling for the decay in your heart, you need a new heart (Ezekiel 36:26). You need to be changed into a new person from the inside out, and only God can do this (2 Cor. 5:17).

It’s about knowing the gospel, repenting of sin, and receiving the eternal love of God in Christ. It doesn’t matter how hard you believe; it it’s not real, it won’t change you, it’ll just be optimistic thinking. Faith only matters if the object of that faith gives what it promises.

3) Weak understanding of the sinful nature and Christian obedience.

But my secret is this: Even though I staked my life on an arbitrary historical document for six years, I liked who I was when I was born-again. I woke up each day determined to conquer my “sinful nature,” i.e., my id that was prone to thinking only about myself, and determined to put others first. I was more selfless. I was a more caring and giving friend back then; I listened deeply, instead of waiting for my turn to talk. I prayed for people and made care packages and wrote nice letters and volunteered. With a divine outlet compelling me to focus on something besides self-preservation, I felt free from the prison of ego.

Let’s break this down:

1) Her sinful nature thought only about herself, and being a Christian is about putting others first.

2) Being a Christian made her more caring and giving.

3) It made her a better listener.

4) She made care packages and wrote nice letters and volunteered.

5) It was a “divine-outlet” that compelled her to be free from the “prison of ego.”

As the saying goes, leggo my ego.

She says that being a “Christian” made her want to be better. That’s awesome! But, apart from Jesus we can’t be better, we’ll only fail every time. Apart from the gospel we are only being moralists. We need a deeper change than the external. Christianity is not a change from the outside in, but the inside out. Although she thought she wanted “Jesus,” she didn’t know Him.

My point is this: according to the Bible, Jessica was never a believer to begin with (1 John 2). She wanted Jesus but didn’t know Him; she prayed the prayed but didn’t know what it was about. No one took her by the hand and showed her what this really means. This may sound like a shunning kind of thing, but it’s not true. If Christianity is true it will have an eternal, lasting effect. It first begins by believing in Christ on the basis of the cross and resurrection and having some, if little, understanding of what they mean for your soul.

When it comes to her theology of obedience, the first issue happens when she says that her sinful nature needed to be, “conquered,” and she was the one to do it. That’s not how it works.

According to the Bible. Romans 8:13 says it’s by the Spirit we put to death “the deeds of the body.” This means that we seek to kill sin by the Holy Spirit, not our own strength. The Christian life is not about conquering a sinful nature, Jesus already did that. It’d about living in harmony with the new one you already have (2 Cor. 5:17, Eph. 4). Jesus destroyed the power of the Law (God’s standard we could never keep) and therefore the power of sin over us. Knowing what is wrong as sinners only makes us want to sin more. So, Jesus fulfilled the Law we couldn’t keep by obeying it perfectly- that, on the cross He gets treated like you should have (declared guilty), and you get treated like Jesus should (declared innocent). What happens is this: You don’t obey God’s law to earn His favor, but obey God’s Law because of it.

It’s about letting go of who you were, not becoming something that you’re not. You’re not in neutral when you become a Christian, the entire direction of your life changes. Even if she doesn’t believe this, it’s still sad to think she never understood this or was never shown that it’s a part of being a Christian.

Think I’m making this up? Consider the following verses:

Do not lie to one another, seeing that you have put off the old self with its practices and have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge after the image of its creator. (Colossians 3:9, 10 ESV)

Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come. (2 Corinthians 5:17 ESV)

The sinful nature is not in control anymore in the Christian’s life. It lost its power when Christ died and rose again. Sin influences a Christian, but the winning nature is the new one created by the Holy Spirit.

We know that our old self was crucified with him in order that the body of sin might be brought to nothing, so that we would no longer be enslaved to sin. For one who has died has been set free from sin. Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him. (Romans 6:6-8 ESV)

She tried to fight sin by suppressing her desires, when true Christianity is about fulfilling your deepest desires by worshiping Christ.

Later this week, we’ll conclude this series along with a personal message to Jessica.

Thanks for reading this lengthy article!

Austin Thompson


The gospel is this: Though you’ve sinned against an infinitely holy God (Isa. 6, Ezekiel 18), earning a sentence of eternity of Hell (Isa. 66)- though you are living in rebellion to Him (Rom. 1:18-3:27)- you, a rebel, can be made right with God (Eph. 1:6-7). You know that you’ve done wrong, but you need to know that God keeps a record of wrongs because He is just (Rom. 3). Though He is just, He is also loving (Jn. 3:16, 1 Jn. 4:1-10). So that these two desires would not be in conflict, God by His wisdom brought justice while demonstrating His love at the same time. He found someone else to be punished instead of you.

God sent the most precious thing to Him out of everything that exists: His only Son. He sent Him to live in your place and die in your place, if you trust Him to save you. He got the death sentence while you receive His reward: a right relationship with God and eternal life. When He rose from the dead, He guaranteed your release from being a slave to your sin and the death that follows. You can be free from sin and right with God. He is the answer to every need of the human heart. He is the only one who can save you from Himself. God desires to save you from His wrath for His love. Will you turn to Him today?



Homosexuals Do Not Exist (Part Three): Why Homosexual Marriage Is Good for the Church.

The Shots Heard Around The World:

A pre-conceived idea of what it all meant
For those who like the same sex had the characteristics
The right-wing conservatives think it’s a decision
And you can be cured with some treatment and religion
Man-made, rewiring of a pre-disposition
Playing God
Ahh nah, here we go
America the brave
Still fears what we don’t know
And God loves all His children
And somehow forgotten
But we paraphrase a book written
3,500 hundred years ago
I don’t know.

– “Same Love” by Macklemore and Ryan Lewis (Feat. Mary Lambert)

Did you hear the gun shots last night? 34 of them, to be exact. They fired from our television screens, into the hearts of conservatives and Christians across the country. The 56th Annual Grammy Awards dared to accomplish what no other awards show has ever attempted before: a simultaneous wedding ceremony, of 34 gay and straight couples, on live television. The tune setting the tone for the brief ceremony, was “Same Love” by Macklemore and Ryan Lewis. The song was penned with a message against hatred of others based on looks, sexual preference, race, or other differences. Instead of destroying liberty, the song calls us to stand on human rights (however you define them). In the middle of the song, Queen Latifah stepped forward on the stage and led the ceremony. The room was electrified with excitement, and tears were shed by not a few faces. The gay rights movement had taken one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind. The counter gospel had just been proclaimed to the tv world. Wait, the counter what? Hold onto that thought. I have some ground to cover, so stay with me.

The counter-gospel (or false gospel as the Bible calls it), is a gospel that promises the same results as the real gospel, but re-writes it to match man’s sinful desires. What happened last night was not in the name of God’s definition of love, but mans. Yet, this event was also a great moment for God’s glory. How? By inviting us to rethink why we are against homosexual marriage to begin with.

The Apostle Paul faced different circumstances than our own, but similar false (or counter) gospels in his lifetime (see Galatians 1). Paul considered the gospel something more than words, it was life (Rom. 1:16-17), it was reality (Eph. 1:3-7), it was historical (1 Cor. 15:3), and it was eternal (Rom. 3:23-27). Many today call what they believe, “my truth,” but, truth is, we don’t need your truth, we need the truth. Therefore, you may wonder why I said homosexual marriage is good for the Church, if homosexual marriage is built on a lie. How is this good for the Church? I thought homosexuality was evil? Aren’t we as Christians supposed to strongly oppose gay marriage?

Think about part two in this series: The point I made was that homosexuals are not a different race or breed of humanity, they are human beings. Many Christians speak of homosexuals as if they are a separate category of people, which is why we forget that they are people, not a different race of sinners. Likewise, the gay community does distinguish itself from the rest of society, wanting open arms from everyone. However, not all gays and lesbians think alike, but many of their voices are heard. The gay community does not think of itself as a community of sinners, but a band of brothers and sisters. Either way, both groups separate the gay community from society in some way or another.

What’s the Design?

The question underneath the question of why homosexuality (and gay marriage) is wrong, is what was man created for? I have previously established that how you define humanity determines your view of sexuality. This is essential to getting our thinking right on the subject. Please read part two if you want to know exactly what I mean by saying that.

There’s an article published online by Nick Gier, Professor Emeritus of the University of Ohio, who writes: “A growing consensus about sexual orientation is that it [is] primarily genetically determined, so gays and lesbians may not have any choice in the matter. There are two alternative theological positions that follow from the conservative Christian position: (1) If homosexuals are inherently evil, then that means that God created them such; or (2) more orthodox and acceptable is the view that all humans are created in the image of God and all that God creates is good. Therefore, if God creates gays and lesbians the way there are, then God must intend that they are an integral part of the human community.” (http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/ngier/sodom.htm)

So, if you look closely, Macklemore and Lewis seem to agree with Professor Grier’s analysis: Homosexuality is a genetic condition. Either God makes evil people, including homosexuals, the way they are, to be instruments of judgement. Or, He makes everyone good and homosexuals are a part of that goodness. The similarity with both groups is that God created homosexuals to be homosexuals. That doesn’t sound right, does it?

If you look for the theme of homosexuality in the Bible, you won’t find anything remotely close to this message. Homosexuality is a result of man steadily moving away from God towards idolatry and creating warped uses of His design (Rom. 1:20-28). That’s the problem: you can’t read societies definition of homosexuality into scripture and expect it to match. A lion and a tiger may conceive a liger, but it won’t reproduce the same breed of either. Don’t expect the Bible’s view to be societies, and vice versa. Mixing the two negates the purposes of both. The Bible never calls anyone a, “homosexual” in a way similar to race or sexual orientation, but it does call everyone sinners (Rom. 3:23, 1 Tim. 1:15-16) (the King James Version does use the word, “homosexual,” but not in speaking of anyone in particular).

Man, according to the Bible, flourishes, and exists at his happiest and best potential when He is under the authority of God (Psa. 119:103, Psa. 23, Eccles. 7:29). To worship God, means not only to praise Him, but to order ones life in a way that glorifies Him, giving Him recognition for everything. In other words, living the design of the Designer. This design includes heterosexual marriage (Gen. 1:27, 2:24), working the earths resources, and raising a family. Reproductive biology and romantic affection are tied together in true science (1 Cor. 7), but society says that they can be mutually exclusive. The shoe doesn’t need to fit for it to be a good purchase. So, according to society, if biology will not allow two men to conceive, they can still have a genuine and loving relationship. Yet, the Bible says God is love, and apart from Christ, no one can know what love is (1 Jn. 4:8). Marriage on earth is the outward symbol for how Christ loves the Church, and the Bible uses the language of bride and bridegroom (Matt. 3, Jn. 1), not bride and bride or bridegroom and bridegroom (Eph. 5).

Who is the Designer?

The Bible and society clash on this issue. Society teaches that man holds the keys to his destiny- he’s the captain of his ship, the key to fulfilling his dreams. Therefore, defining sexuality flows from what man thinks is right. In this worldview, sexuality is not necessarily tied to biology (scientifically it is), its main purpose is love. Biological predispositions to the same-sex, according to the song by Macklemore and Lewis, is given to us by god, but which god? Let’s ask them.

“No law’s gonna change us
We have to change us
Whatever god you believe in
We come from the same one
Strip away the fear
Underneath it’s all the same love
About time that we raised up.”

So, whatever god we believe in, there’s only one who made us? That’s confusing and intolerant of other religions that believe in more than one god (hint hint, Mormons). They don’t even know the answer to which deity determines what is sexually correct. The god they speak of doesn’t exist, he’s made up. Now time for the good news:

The gospel says that we are sinners who are rebels of God, and need to be reconciled to Him, by forgiveness in Jesus Christ. Homosexuality is just like any other sin, but it’s expression is emotionally deeper and more outwardly expressed than other sins. The counter-gospel of today wants us to rewrite sin and say that homosexuality is God’s design. But, as Christians we are not against people, which is the message us Christians seem to imply when we speak against gay marriage. We are against sin, and only God can open their eyes to true satisfaction and love (2 Cor. 4). I believe we can be more passionate in speaking out against gay marriage by speaking to someone who is, “gay” and telling them about Jesus. Yet, another reason why I believe the term, “homosexual” is camouflage for a deeper word: sinner. Tomorrow, I will answer more questions about identity and sinfulness. Now, for the summary:

The reason why I believe that homosexual marriage is a good thing for the Church, is that it awakens us to reality. Scripture doesn’t tells us to try and change society, or to put Christian morals on non-Christians. Should we be grateful that our country was founded on Christian values? Absolutely, but that’s not our mission as Christians, to defend the constitution at the cost of paying full attention to God’s word.

The Bible says that we need to live godly and quiet lives at the present time (1 Thess. 1), to “honor the emperor [or president] (1 Pet. 2),” pay taxes, obey the government, respect the authorities (Rom. 13, Matt. 22), and use the freedoms we have here to share the gospel (Matt. 28:18). Rick Warren told Mark Driscoll at the Resurgence conference, “our job is not to win America; our job is to win Americans.” This event at the Grammy’s was a wake up call to us Christians to stop politicizing our beliefs, and to start living them. Therefore, share the gospel, tell people about Jesus, and don’t dance around homosexuality as a movement, go to people as they are: sinners in need of the grace of God found only in Jesus Christ.

Until next time,
Austin Thompson


Homosexuals Do Not Exist: Recapping The First Two Posts.

This was intended to be a five-part series, but the more I’ve tried to make it only five posts, the easier it has become for people to misunderstand my intentions or the content of the posts. So, consider this a review of parts one and two, arecourse to make it easier for everyone, and an introduction to part three.

Writing this series has been challenging- finding what to say is not the issue, but making the argument simple is. The difficult task I face in writing a series like this, is having a simple argument without sacrificing content. This is not meant to stir your intellect only, but to challenge you on what you believe.

So, over the next three days I want to make the direction of the series clearer and much more simple. I am a Christian, I believe the Bible is without error and without fallacies. I believe there is salvation only in Jesus Christ. I believe all of us are sinners in need of the Savior. I am tired of the church saying homosexuality is a sin but not understanding everything the Bible has to say about homosexuality. I also want the world to know what Christians believe when they confess the Bible is true. I want them to understand that the cultures definition of love is much different than the Bible’s definition. We all need to challenge ourselves on this issue, because there are real people involved here, not simply an ideology.

The overarching theme is that I believe homosexuals do not exist, and neither does the Bible. I believe homosexuality does exist, and those whom we call homosexual, gay, lesbian, or any other name do participate in homosexuality. In the first post I dealt with arguments some may have in response to saying homosexuals do not exist, but homosexuality does- including, how, you can’t live without seeing or hearing about this thing called the gay community. If you want to go back and review, feel free.

The previous posts introduced why I think this way, and why, if you disagree with the Bible on what defines humanity, sexuality, and identity, you will disagree with my final analysis, too. If anything I’ve said comes across as pure opinion, then I apologize. Although my analysis of the culture and politics is my opinion, my conclusions regarding the truth is from the Bible. Jesus said to God the Father, “You word is truth (John 17:3).” Therefore, let’s have a quick review and then deal with the topic of identity.

Since I’ve begun writing on homosexuality, some people became confused about what I’m trying to say. In a short summary, let me explain what I’ve laid out on the blog so far:

1) Christians need to think about homosexuality in a deeper way. Do we use the term, “homosexual” as a word to describe what a person desires/does, or is it a word that signifies an identity, that can’t be undone?

Is homosexuality a human condition or natural consequence?

2) Both Christians and Non-Christians separate homosexuals (aka gay and lesbian) from the rest of the world. Some Christians say that they are marked in a way that makes them less likely to receive the gospel. However, the Bible doesn’t say that someone who commits homosexuality is a different kind of sinner. Yet, as Christians in America we distinguish them, speaking about them as if we agree with everyone else that they are born that way, but still disagree with the lifestyle.

In other words, we’re all people.

3) Underneath the question of identity is, what does it mean to be human? Society and the Bible have differing views. If man determines what it means to be human, then sexuality is not a matter of what appears natural (relations leading to procreation…meaning heterosexuality), but of what feels natural to us.

The Bible says what is natural was created by a supernatural God. He determined the course for humanity, and humanity wanted something different. God ordained this to happen, to set the course for salvation in Jesus. By returning to our Creator, we can flourish and enjoy truth by worshiping Him, not our ideas of truth.

There are still three days left of posts to be uploaded. I encourage you to read them and not assume anything until the last page. Now that we’ve worked our way to the purpose of humanity, we must ask what is the identity of humanity apart from God.

Until next time,

Austin Thompson

Homosexuals Do Not Exist (Part Two): You’re Only Human.

Let me begin with a quote from a song by Billy Joel. This song was written some time after Billy had failed an attempt at suicide. After getting what he calls a, “second wind,” he wrote down his reasons for continuing to live. In the song he talks about humanity, here are the lyrics:

You’re having a hard time and lately you don’t feel so good
You’re getting a bad reputation in your neighborhood
It’s alright, it’s alright
Sometimes that’s what it takes
You’re only human, you’re allowed to make your share of mistakes
You better believe there will be times in your life
When you’ll be feeling like a stumbling fool
So take it from me you’ll learn more from your accidents
Than anything that you could ever learn at school – Billy Joel, You’re Only Human (Second Wind)

People on both sides of the spectrum, what we call liberal and conservative, might throw stones at this post and say that I’m insane. “Homosexuals do exist!”, they might say. Just turn on the news, read the paper, go on the internet, or walk out in public, fact is they’re everywhere! Really? I must have been living in the jungle or never owned a television, or gone outside. You and I both know that people of the same sex date, some marry, and others want their freedom to be accepted. But, here’s the truth we often avoid altogether: they’re people. Is it possible that gays, lesbians, and others have been categorized to the point where we treat them as a different class of human beings? Perhaps they themselves also think that way (as we’ll see in part 3).

What if they’re just people who walk like humans and talk like humans, but go by a term we (or they) made up for them. What if it’s just a term that we call them? Think about it: When you walk around and see two women holding hands, you don’t make a distinction of species- apart from some external differences, they’re people like everyone else. Distinctions of class, possibly. Either way, you can’t deny they are people. So, where do these distinctions come from? Do they come from our own thinking? Possibly. We have names for business products, government policies, political parties, food groups, restaurants, ethnicities, languages, and now, sexuality. It’s our way of identifying things. Do distinctions of sexuality come from God? Many would say yes, especially Christians. But, does the Bible use the term, “homosexual,” like we use it? Wait, I’m speeding through this too quickly: let’s get to the core and work our way out from there.

Our words have value, and how we define things matters, because it affects the way we see them and what relates to them. The choice of our words is even more valuable, but words aren’t people. We can’t invent a new term every time we feel like it. That’s what we need to deal with when it comes to this issue: every person is a person. We all have things in common that bind us together, before we make distinctions that possibly blur them. So, the next question we need to ask is: what does it mean to be human? Answers will vary. I’d like to look through the eyes of American Society and the Bible once again. Society and the Bible don’t disagree on every point, but how their points are shaped is certainly different.

Society’s Argument: You’re human, what they call homosapiens. You’re basically a smarter animal. You make mistakes; you fall in love. You grow up, get a job and save up money for retirement. You try to afford the best kind of life for your children. Some people are evil, and we just can’t explain it. Humanity is good, and there is a goodness that we need to bring out in each other. The best thing we can do is learn to be at peace with one other, and ourselves. The idea of an afterlife is at best a fantasy, at most a destination that any person of faith will be allowed into (even Atheists). Heaven exists, we’re just not sure if there’s a god or a spiritual being, or none at all. Sex is good, and therefore should not be restricted to monogamy. The grave is all there is waiting for us, make the most of your life here. Mess up, have stories to tell, live while you’re young so you won’t have regrets later in life. Your destiny is in your hands. Become who you want to be, don’t let anyone define it for you.

The Biblical Argument: Human beings are not animals. Though we share many things in common, we are made in the image of God. In His image, we represent Him in some sense on this earth. We rule over animals and all creation- they are not our equals, but we have the same Creator. Mankind was created to flourish and exist under the authority of God: that means have babies, enjoy God, enjoy the earth, and build onto it. Work was created by God before sin entered the world, to use the earth in a way that pleases Him. Sex was created by God to be enjoyed by a man and woman, with the result being children and eventually a community. Since sin entered the world, we idolize our jobs, our sexuality (thinking any sex is good), our children, and worship anything but Him.

Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” And God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food. And to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heavens and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.” And it was so. And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day. (Genesis 1:26-31 ESV)

The first people decided that they wanted to be like God even more, which was a lie from Satan (they were made in His image). They already had a knowledge of good and evil, but they went even farther and learned this knowledge by experience, Sin, and therefore mistakes, death, pain, and division entered the world. There is no good in us according to the Bible (Rom. 3), however, our conscience and God’s law are written on our hearts (Rom. 2) to protects us from being as evil as we could be (2 Thess. 2-3). You know not to do something even before someone tells you not to do it.

There is still a resemblance of what we were before the fall, but our potential apart from Christ is to sin even more. God alone is good, and calls us back to Himself in Jesus Christ. The only person who has a right to make distinctions among humanity is God. There is one God, and He did not make mankind according to social status or race, but in His Image. Sin brought about the division of mankind and separation from God.

How you view humanity is directly tied to how you view homosexuality. If your view of humanity is similar to the consensus, or divided opinions of society, then humanity can determine what is good for itself. It’s own observations, experiences, and consensus overrules anything we perceive as natural; nature bends to our wills. Nature is simply that which we call normal, as it relates to us and our own experiences. Homosexuality may not compliment procreation, but romantic love and procreation are two separate things in this worldview. They don’t have as close of a relationship as in the Christian worldview.

The Christian worldview says that homosexuality does not compliment sexuality as it was intended to be- in fact, it is against nature. Procreation was meant to be the result of those desires (with marriage preceding the sexual relationship). One says sexual experience was designed to be between one man and one woman, because it was designed that way- the other says, homosexuals are born with these impulses, and therefore “designed” by nature to fulfill them in a loving relationship with another of the same sex.

With differing views of humanity established, what do we therefore mean when we call someone a homosexual (if you’re religious), or gay, or lesbian? Are we using these words to describe the affections, actions, and wants of others? That, what they want is just different than what you want. Or is it deeper than that, relating to the way they are genetically designed?

Is homosexuality simply meant to be a term to express the one-sex only part of the desire? Maybe we don’t even know, or don’t even care- we just want people to do their thing, and we’ll do our thing. Go smoke your dope, marry someone of the same sex, buy enough guns for the apocalypse, and some pornography while you’re at it. Just leave me alone to do as I please, right? This is all wrong. This is not a liberty issue, a political issue, or a religious-political issue. The question is whether these words are terms for behavior, genetics, or words for identities. That is what makes the difference. The question behind the question is, where does my identity come from?

That’s what I want to uncover over the next few days: let’s stop assuming we know what we’re talking about because it’s what we think, and start saying what we think because it’s what we know. Specifically, I’m addressing Christians. Why do we have our pet passages to explain homosexuality is a sin, but never read the Bible enough to see that those called homosexuals are people too? Also, are we absolutely sure that the way we view homosexuality is entirely aligned with what the Bible says? Let’s not just look at what is a sin, but why it is sin. Also, let’s be careful not to describe sin the same way unbelievers describe it, the language doesn’t always correlate. If homosexuality is explained in the Bible in a way that’s different than the culture, but we speak against it using the word, not the way the Bible does, but the way unbelievers do, then people will assume that we think homosexuality is just as natural as society believes it is, but we still disagree with it. Let’s get our terms right.

Until tomorrow,
Austin Thompson

Homosexuals Do Not Exist (Part One): Identity or Attribute? The Philosophical Foundation.

I’m sure you’re wondering why I picked a title like this one. You might find it both shocking and ambiguous. If the title is what drove you to read this, then thank you for taking time to come to my page. I hope this serves you and others reading this.

The subject of homosexuality has weighed heavily on my heart the last month. With all the political, theological, and televised discussion about it, I’ve seen Christians give poor theology and unbelievers misrepresent Christians. The Phil Robertson controversy only brought about what had been bubbling underneath the surface; what everyone’s thoughts already were on the subject. So, let me be honest with you: I don’t think the church in America has a fully-Biblical understanding of homosexuality and I also think society has misrepresented Christians. I’m no expert by worldly standards; I don’t have a degree, I’m not a Pastor, and politics isn’t my forte. Any authority I claim to have comes from the word of God, and any cultural sources that I cite are in the authors/speakers own words. What I do have is a burden for the Church to read the Bible and use it on its own terms, and also for the unbeliever to know what Christians are about. So, please know that I wrote none of this out of a personal agenda for self-glory- my agenda is to get all of us thinking. Bear with me for a moment and ask yourself whether you agree with the title. What’s your interpretation of, “Homosexuals do not exist”?

You could see the title being for or against homosexuality; options also include confusing, or just plain crazy. Whatever the case, I ask that you read this series in its entirety. I ask for Christians to have open hearts and minds, and for those of you who are prepared to judge before the evidence is presented: chill. I’d like to take a minute and play with your perceptions of what you think these posts might be about. These four points are not meant to be straw-men stereotypes of different beliefs, but summaries of the beliefs of different people I’ve encountered over the years.

First, in regards to being for homosexuality, the title could imply that.

You could say that I’m here to bring down distinctions of sexuality; forget making distinctions, and love whoever you want. I’m just progressing what began with the Civil Rights movement and has now eclipsed in the next stage of humanity: the Gay rights movement. Blacks were discriminated, and gays today are discriminated against, too. Stop focusing on the colors (distinctions) of the rainbow (humanity) and start appreciating it for what it is. Homosexuals do not exist, but people do, and titles only divide us. We should all be united and pursue world peace. Michael Jackson and friends sang that, “we are the world.” Is that what I’m saying?

Second, you could see this post as against homosexuality.

The historical position of Christianity is that any kind of sexual activity apart from marriage is sin. Marriage is only between one man and one woman. Procreation and marital union align with God’s design for sexuality. However, some Christians aren’t satisfied with this position only being held in the realm of the local church- they also want society to embrace it. Some politicize it: The legalization of gay marriage in our country should make our blood boil, right? This is a Christian nation!

Maybe even thrown in some angry fundamentalism: Homosexuals do not exist, they’re just a bunch of reprobate sinners! It’s all about what Romans one says, that God let mankind seal their fate by choosing to sin. God gave them over to their sin, but not me! I’m a blood-bought believer, who is free from that lifestyle. My sin is already dealt with, but theirs, oh, just wait and see! We all know that God’s wrath is on them more than drunks or adulterers. They’re marked like Cain, and cursed by God. It’s too difficult to evangelize to them; after all, they’re already lost, right?

Third, you might find this title confusing.

Why would I say homosexuals don’t exist when everyone already believes they do? It seems like saying homosexuals don’t exist would deny what nature and nurture (to some) teach us. Isn’t it obvious that they don’t call themselves homosexuals (possibly a term for disrespect), but gay, lesbian, or even bi, and all the things the LBGT stand for? Isn’t this post therefore redundant, irrelevant, ill-informed, or just plain stupid? This leaves you with more questions than answers.

Fourth, I’m crazy (see point three).

Maybe I’ve convinced myself they don’t exist, and also that Santa Clause is real and the tooth fairy is real. Maybe I’m just promoting an ideology or a new theory that’s supposed to change the way we think. I could also be a religious nut who wants to bother people with a post that means absolutely nothing, and will not accomplish anything important, but just divide people even more. I have three words to say to that: wait and see.

Are you ready to go on this journey with me?

Today’s post is meant to encourage you to start challenging yourself about what you believe about sexuality. Start asking the hard questions. I don’t want any of who read this series of posts to leave seeing your convictions in the same way.

I would like to leave you with a few questions for today:

What is love? What does it mean to love?
Why is homosexuality such an important issue? Is it?
How should a Christian respond to homosexuality? Even though not every Christian thinks the same way, what should their basis be?
Is homosexuality a lifestyle, an attribute, or an identity?

Until tomorrow,
Austin Thompson